May 31
Well, the guy at Jessops left a memory card in the camera by mistake and threw in a remote control for gratis.
I didn’t get such a good deal on it like with the canon g10, but I did get a 70-300mm lens so that I can do that nature photography that I’ve been getting interested in. All in all, bag, d60, lens, less than a grand. Should I want something better in a few years then there’s a good chance that nikon will still be using the same fittings that they’re using now.
Spend a bit of time in Newbury with the camera straight after buying it and wondered around a bit to take photos of stuff. More getting used to it than to get something that’s impressive.
Yesterday however, before going to town I took a photo of a misc plant with the g10 and a close up filter. Looks nice to me, your views might differ.

Today’s picture (might have to remove this - not sure though).

and this one too perhaps

a view of Newbury Park Way


and something going on at the band stand in Victoria Park

May 24
After the latest phishing scams on facebook involving the .at domains, the next generation of the same scam seem to be using .be domain names.
The .be domain names that ve come to light so far are but not limited to
whiteflash.be
goldbase.be
sweeter.be
bestspace.be
These domains are all operating out of the same ip at 211.95.78.98.
This ip temporarily blocked the sites but the .be sites seem to be up and running again. Facebook is yet to curb these links as of 0130hrs IST, May 25th, 2009.
The latest message format is
Look at this
wwww whiteflash be
Anyway, there is no need to click on any of such .be or erstwhile .at links or put in your facebook username and passwords.
If you accidentally did that, then change you facebook password immediately. If it has already been changed by the rogue malware (there have been reports to this effect), then you can use the lost password link to reset your facebook password.
May 05
Well, not much is going on tonight. It’s been rather quiet. There’s some crunchy tunes on Tim Westwood’s show, he might talk his mouth off quite a bit but his record budget is going well.
Here’s a picture from Saturday taken in Reading:

Here is something from today - ants again but perhaps from a better perspective:

Minimalist window managers rock. Why can’t every X11 application developer implement the –geometry option? I just got my .xinit sorted!
/usr/bin/urxvt -sl 65535 -ip -tint grey -sh 40 -highlightColor blue -fg white -cursorColor2 blue -geometry 80x24+0+0 &
/usr/bin/urxvt -sl 65535 -ip -tint grey -sh 40 -highlightColor blue -fg white -cursorColor2 blue -geometry 80x24+498+0 &
/usr/bin/urxvt -sl 65535 -ip -tint grey -sh 40 -highlightColor blue -fg white -cursorColor2 blue -geometry 80x24+0+318 &
/usr/bin/urxvt -sl 65535 -ip -tint grey -sh 40 -highlightColor blue -fg white -cursorColor2 blue -geometry 80x24+498+318 &
/usr/bin/urxvt -sl 65535 -ip -tint grey -sh 40 -highlightColor blue -fg white -cursorColor2 blue -geometry 80x24+0+636 &
/usr/bin/urxvt -sl 65535 -ip -tint grey -sh 40 -highlightColor blue -fg white -cursorColor2 blue -geometry 80x24+498+636 &
Perhaps I’ve over stressed the point in the above code snippet, but if I want something to be located somewhere on the screen each time I start X, then why deviate from the norm and ignore the –geometry?
Recent Comments